| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 129 | |
| 3. |  | CARDOSO, M. O.; BERNI, R. F. Crescimento e produção em quiabeiro com doses de nitrogênio. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 29, n. 2, p. S1777-S1783, jul. 2011. CD-ROM. Suplemento. Trabalho apresentado no 51. Congresso Brasileiro de Olericultura, 2011, Viçosa.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. |
|    |
| 9. | | CARDOSO, M. O.; BERNI, R. F. Índices agronômicos na cebolinha com doses de sulfato de amônio. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 30, n. 2, p. S2375-2382, jul. 2012. Suplemento. Edição dos Resumos do 52º Congresso Brasileiro de Olericultura, Salvador, jul. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. |
| |
| 16. | | CARDOSO, M. O.; KRUG, C.; BERNI, R. F. Altura e suprimento de nitrogênio afetando a Plutella xylostella na couve-de-folhas sob cobertura plástica. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 30, n. 2, p. S986-991, jul. 2012. Suplemento. Edição dos Resumos do 52º Congresso Brasileiro de Olericultura, Salvador, jul. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 129 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/11/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/11/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
C - 0 |
|
Autoria: |
QUIJAS, S.; BOIT, B.; THONICKE, K.; MURRAY-TORTAROLO, G.; MWAMPAMBA, T.; SKUTSCH, M.; SIMÕES, M.; ASCARRUNZ, N.; PEÑA-CLAROS, M.; JONES, L.; ARETS, E.; JARAMILLO, V. J.; LAZOS, E.; TOLEDO, M.; MARTORANO, L. G.; FERRAZ, R. P. D.; BALVANERA, P. |
|
Afiliação: |
SANDRA QUIJAS, CENTRO UNIVERSITARIO DE LA COSTA, UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA, PUERTO VALLARTA, MEXICO; ALICE BOIT, INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM, POTSDAM, GERMANY; KIRSTEN THONICKE, RESEARCH DOMAIN I EARTH SYSTEM ANALYSIS, POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT, RESEARCH, POTSDAM, GERMANY; GUILLERMO MURRAY-TORTAROLO, INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN ECOSISTEMAS Y SUSTENTABILIDAD, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO, MORELIA, MEXICO; TUYENI MWAMPAMBA, INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN ECOSISTEMAS Y SUSTENTABILIDAD, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO, MORELIA, MEXICO; MARGARET SKUTSCH, CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN GEOGRAFÍA AMBIENTAL, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE, MÉXICO, MORELIA, MEXICO; MARGARETH GONCALVES SIMOES, CNPS; NATALY ASCARRUNZ, EXECUTIVE DIRECTION, INSTITUTO BOLIVIANO DE INVESTIGACIÓN FORESTAL, SANTA CRUZ DE LA SIERRA, BOLIVIA; MARIELOS PEÑA-CLAROS, FOREST ECOLOGY AND FOREST MANAGEMENT GROUP, WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY, WAGENINGEN, THE NETHERLANDS; LAURENCE JONES, CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY & HYDROLOGY, NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL, BANGOR, UNITED KINGDOM; ERIC ARETS, WAGENINGEN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, WAGENINGEN UR, WAGENINGEN, THE NETHERLANDS; VÍCTOR J. JARAMILLO, INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN ECOSISTEMAS Y SUSTENTABILIDAD, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO, MORELIA, MEXICO; ELENA LAZOS, INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES SOCIALES, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO, CIUDAD DE MEXICO, MEXICO; MARISOL TOLEDO, RESEARCH CORDINATION, INSTITUTO BOLIVIANO DE INVESTIGACIÓN FORESTAL, SANTA CRUZ DE LA SIERRA, BOLIVIA; LUCIETA GUERREIRO MARTORANO, CPATU; RODRIGO PECANHA DEMONTE FERRAZ, CNPS; PATRICIA BALVANERA, INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN ECOSISTEMAS Y SUSTENTABILIDAD, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO, MORELIA, MEXICO. |
|
Título: |
Modelling carbon stock and carbon sequestration ecosystem services for policy design: a comprehensive approach using a dynamic vegetation model. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ecosystems and People, v. 15, n. 1, p. 42-60, 2018. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395908.2018.1542413 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Ecosystem service (ES) models can only inform policy design adequately if they incorporate ecological processes. We used the Lund-Potsdam-Jena managed Land (LPJmL) model, to address following questions for Mexico, Bolivia and Brazilian Amazon: (i) How different are C stocks and C sequestration quantifications under standard (when soil and litter C and heterotrophic respiration are not considered) and comprehensive (including all C stock and heterotrophic respiration) approach? and (ii) How does the valuation of C stock and C sequestration differ in national payments for ES and global C funds or markets when comparing both approach? We found that up to 65% of C stocks have not been taken into account by neglecting to include C stored in soil and litter, resulting in gross underpayments (up to 500 times lower). Since emissions from heterotrophic respiration of organic material offset a large proportion of C gained through growth of living matter, we found that markets and decision-makers are inadvertently overestimating up to 100 times C sequestrated. New approaches for modelling C services relevant ecological process-based can help accounting for C in soil, litter and heterotrophic respiration and become important for the operationalization of agreements on climate change mitigation following the COP21 in 2015. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Carbono do solo; Mercados globais de carbono; Modelo dinâmico de vegetação global; Pagamento por serviços ecossistêmicos; Respiração heterotrófica; Tomadores de decisão. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/187185/1/2018-056.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02580naa a2200397 a 4500
001 2100223
005 2021-11-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/26395908.2018.1542413$2DOI
100 1 $aQUIJAS, S.
245 $aModelling carbon stock and carbon sequestration ecosystem services for policy design$ba comprehensive approach using a dynamic vegetation model.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aEcosystem service (ES) models can only inform policy design adequately if they incorporate ecological processes. We used the Lund-Potsdam-Jena managed Land (LPJmL) model, to address following questions for Mexico, Bolivia and Brazilian Amazon: (i) How different are C stocks and C sequestration quantifications under standard (when soil and litter C and heterotrophic respiration are not considered) and comprehensive (including all C stock and heterotrophic respiration) approach? and (ii) How does the valuation of C stock and C sequestration differ in national payments for ES and global C funds or markets when comparing both approach? We found that up to 65% of C stocks have not been taken into account by neglecting to include C stored in soil and litter, resulting in gross underpayments (up to 500 times lower). Since emissions from heterotrophic respiration of organic material offset a large proportion of C gained through growth of living matter, we found that markets and decision-makers are inadvertently overestimating up to 100 times C sequestrated. New approaches for modelling C services relevant ecological process-based can help accounting for C in soil, litter and heterotrophic respiration and become important for the operationalization of agreements on climate change mitigation following the COP21 in 2015.
653 $aCarbono do solo
653 $aMercados globais de carbono
653 $aModelo dinâmico de vegetação global
653 $aPagamento por serviços ecossistêmicos
653 $aRespiração heterotrófica
653 $aTomadores de decisão
700 1 $aBOIT, B.
700 1 $aTHONICKE, K.
700 1 $aMURRAY-TORTAROLO, G.
700 1 $aMWAMPAMBA, T.
700 1 $aSKUTSCH, M.
700 1 $aSIMÕES, M.
700 1 $aASCARRUNZ, N.
700 1 $aPEÑA-CLAROS, M.
700 1 $aJONES, L.
700 1 $aARETS, E.
700 1 $aJARAMILLO, V. J.
700 1 $aLAZOS, E.
700 1 $aTOLEDO, M.
700 1 $aMARTORANO, L. G.
700 1 $aFERRAZ, R. P. D.
700 1 $aBALVANERA, P.
773 $tEcosystems and People$gv. 15, n. 1, p. 42-60, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
